jewelry: was important to mesopotamia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.63
, vehicle
Weight: 0.60
, accessory
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wedding
Weight: 0.62
, earring
Weight: 0.61
, wrist watch
Weight: 0.60
, wristwatch
Weight: 0.53
, fob
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to mesopotamia 1.00
be important to fijians 0.91
is cp-mk 0.79
be very important for girls 0.78
is valuable 0.76
is needed 0.76
be important to study of early history 0.75
is difficult 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(artifact, be important to study of early history)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(artifact, is needed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(artifact, is needed)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(artifact, be important to study of early history)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be important to study of early history)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(artifact, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fob, is difficult)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(artifact, be important to study of early history)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(artifact, is needed)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fob, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fob, is difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, is cp-mk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(jewelry, is cp-mk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(jewelry, is cp-mk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, be important to fijians)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(jewelry, be important to fijians)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(jewelry, is cp-mk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(jewelry, be important to fijians)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(jewelry, be important to fijians)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, is difficult)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(jewelry, be very important for girls)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(jewelry, is valuable)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(jewelry, is difficult)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, be very important for girls)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, is valuable)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(jewelry, is difficult)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(jewelry, be very important for girls)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(jewelry, is difficult)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(jewelry, is valuable)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(jewelry, be very important for girls)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(jewelry, is valuable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(artifact, is needed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to study of early history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fob, is difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(artifact, is needed)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(jewelry, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to study of early history)