jim: be at rock band

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents colleague
Weight: 0.62
, friend
Weight: 0.61
, man
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, author
Weight: 0.56
Siblings michael
Weight: 0.36
, dave
Weight: 0.35
, gordon
Weight: 0.35
, david
Weight: 0.35
, paul
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at rock band 1.00
wants to see band 0.86
listen to band 0.85
pick rock 0.84
play guitar 0.78
be at concert 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(artist, play guitar)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(jim, be at rock band)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(artist, be at concert)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(jim, be at rock band)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(jim, be at rock band)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(artist, play guitar)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(jim, be at rock band)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(artist, be at concert)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(jim, be at rock band)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(artist, play guitar)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(jim, be at rock band)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(artist, be at concert)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(artist, play guitar)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(jim, be at rock band)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(jim, be at rock band)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(artist, be at concert)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(jim, be at rock band)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(jim, be at rock band)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(jim, be at rock band)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(jim, be at rock band)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(jim, be at rock band)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(jim, be at rock band)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(jim, be at rock band)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(jim, be at rock band)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(jim, be at rock band)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(jim, be at rock band)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(artist, play guitar)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(jim, be at rock band)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(artist, be at concert)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(jim, be at rock band)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(artist, play guitar)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(jim, be at rock band)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(artist, be at concert)