job: be good for economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents assignment
Weight: 0.60
, challenge
Weight: 0.60
, crisis
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings auto mechanic
Weight: 0.67
, peace corps
Weight: 0.65
, firefighter
Weight: 0.65
, janitor
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for economy 1.00
be important to economy 0.95
be are affected by economy 0.84
be better than business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(job, be good for economy)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(job, be important to economy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(job, be important to economy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(job, be important to economy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(job, be are affected by economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(job, be important to economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(job, be are affected by economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(job, be are affected by economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(job, be are affected by economy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(job, be better than business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(job, be better than business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(job, be better than business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(job, be better than business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(job, be good for economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(job, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(job, be good for economy)