joint: hurt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.60
, body part
Weight: 0.59
, committee
Weight: 0.59
, system
Weight: 0.57
, structure
Weight: 0.56
Siblings big toe
Weight: 0.57
, hinge
Weight: 0.56
, elbow
Weight: 0.55
, commission
Weight: 0.31
, bone
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt 1.00
hurt time 0.96
hurt bad 0.95
hurt at night 0.89
hurt on days 0.89
hurt after night 0.88
hurt in weather 0.85
hurt during period 0.83
hurt before period 0.83
hurt in cold weather 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(elbow, hurt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(elbow, hurt)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(elbow, hurt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(joint, hurt)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(joint, hurt at night)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(joint, hurt at night)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(joint, hurt at night)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(joint, hurt at night)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(joint, hurt in weather)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(joint, hurt in weather)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(joint, hurt in cold weather)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(joint, hurt in weather)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(joint, hurt in cold weather)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(joint, hurt in weather)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(joint, hurt in cold weather)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(joint, hurt in cold weather)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(joint, hurt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(joint, hurt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(joint, hurt)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(elbow, hurt)