joke: be funnier than brunette jokes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.64
, message
Weight: 0.63
, picture
Weight: 0.62
, remark
Weight: 0.62
Siblings laughter
Weight: 0.64
, headline
Weight: 0.57
, laughing
Weight: 0.56
, insult
Weight: 0.55
, pun
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be funnier than brunette jokes 1.00
have funny 0.83
be on jokes 0.83
is funny 0.83
be with punchlines funny 0.83
get downvoted in funny 0.82
be with predictable punchlines funny 0.82
is fucking funny 0.82
be funny to people 0.82
be about jonestown funny 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pun, is funny)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(laughing, is funny)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(laughing, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(laughing, is funny)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pun, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pun, is funny)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(joke, have funny)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(joke, be with punchlines funny)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(joke, be with predictable punchlines funny)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(joke, is funny)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(joke, be funny to people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(joke, have funny)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(joke, have funny)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(joke, be with punchlines funny)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(joke, is funny)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(joke, be with predictable punchlines funny)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(joke, be with punchlines funny)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(joke, get downvoted in funny)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(joke, get downvoted in funny)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(joke, be funny to people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(joke, is funny)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(joke, be with predictable punchlines funny)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(joke, be funny to people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(joke, get downvoted in funny)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(joke, get downvoted in funny)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(joke, is funny)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(joke, be with punchlines funny)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(joke, have funny)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(joke, be with predictable punchlines funny)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(joke, be funny to people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(laughing, is funny)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(joke, be funnier than brunette jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pun, is funny)