judas: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.60
, song
Weight: 0.55
, character
Weight: 0.54
, example
Weight: 0.50
Siblings jesse james
Weight: 0.34
, mahatma gandhi
Weight: 0.34
, gordon
Weight: 0.34
, osama bin laden
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
be seen as bad 0.77
is bad guy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(judas, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(gordon, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(judas, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(gordon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(gordon, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(judas, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(judas, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(judas, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(judas, be seen as bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(judas, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(judas, be seen as bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(judas, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(judas, is bad guy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(judas, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(judas, be seen as bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(judas, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(judas, is bad guy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(judas, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(judas, is bad guy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(judas, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(judas, be seen as bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(judas, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(judas, is bad guy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(judas, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(judas, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(judas, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(judas, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(judas, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(judas, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gordon, has quality bad)