judge: be at car show

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.63
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.57
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.74
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.64
, mayor
Weight: 0.58
, contestant
Weight: 0.53
, lawyer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at car show 1.00
win car from game show 0.85
be require to travel by car 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(judge, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(contestant, win car from game show)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(judge, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mayor, be require to travel by car)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(judge, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(contestant, win car from game show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(contestant, win car from game show)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(judge, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(mayor, be require to travel by car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(mayor, be require to travel by car)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(judge, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(judge, be at car show)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(judge, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(judge, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(judge, be at car show)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(judge, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(judge, be at car show)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(judge, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(contestant, win car from game show)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(judge, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(mayor, be require to travel by car)