judge: be elected in maryland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.63
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.60
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.74
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.64
, marshall
Weight: 0.61
, contestant
Weight: 0.53
, litigant
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be elected in maryland 1.00
be in texas elected 0.89
be elected in texas 0.89
be in texas elected by population 0.87
be elected 0.83
is elected 0.82
be elected in us 0.80
be appointed under missouri plan 0.77
be in texas chosen 0.77
is elected position 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(judge, be elected in maryland)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(judge, is elected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(judge, be elected in texas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(judge, is elected)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(judge, be elected in texas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(judge, be elected in texas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(judge, be elected in texas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(judge, is elected)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(judge, is elected)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(judge, be elected in maryland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(judge, be elected in maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(judge, be elected in maryland)