juggernaut: be laner

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents member
Weight: 0.42
, character
Weight: 0.41
, game
Weight: 0.40
, villain
Weight: 0.40
, force
Weight: 0.39
Siblings wizard
Weight: 0.29
, momentum
Weight: 0.28
, kingpin
Weight: 0.28
, superman
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be laner 1.00
be mid laner 0.90
be viable laner 0.86
be viable mid laner 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(juggernaut, be laner)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(juggernaut, be mid laner)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(juggernaut, be mid laner)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(juggernaut, be viable laner)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(juggernaut, be mid laner)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(juggernaut, be mid laner)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(juggernaut, be viable mid laner)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(juggernaut, be viable mid laner)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(juggernaut, be viable mid laner)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(juggernaut, be viable laner)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(juggernaut, be viable laner)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(juggernaut, be viable mid laner)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(juggernaut, be viable laner)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(juggernaut, be laner)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(juggernaut, be laner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(juggernaut, be laner)