jump: be good deal on phones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, command
Weight: 0.55
, song
Weight: 0.55
Siblings quad
Weight: 0.54
, leap
Weight: 0.49
, fall
Weight: 0.33
, slide
Weight: 0.33
, hop
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good deal on phones 1.00
be good deal on phones with storage 0.92
be good deal on phones with extra storage 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(jump, be good deal on phones)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(jump, be good deal on phones)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(jump, be good deal on phones)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(jump, be good deal on phones with storage)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(jump, be good deal on phones)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(jump, be good deal on phones with storage)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(jump, be good deal on phones)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jump, be good deal on phones with storage)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(jump, be good deal on phones)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(jump, be good deal on phones with extra storage)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(jump, be good deal on phones)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(jump, be good deal on phones with extra storage)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(jump, be good deal on phones)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(jump, be good deal on phones with storage)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(jump, be good deal on phones)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(jump, be good deal on phones with extra storage)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(jump, be good deal on phones)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(jump, be good deal on phones with extra storage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(jump, be good deal on phones)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(jump, be good deal on phones)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(jump, be good deal on phones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(jump, be good deal on phones)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(jump, be good deal on phones)