jumping: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents move
Weight: 0.62
, discipline
Weight: 0.56
, sport
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, event
Weight: 0.49
Siblings rock climbing
Weight: 0.33
, ice climbing
Weight: 0.33
, mountain climbing
Weight: 0.32
, rolling
Weight: 0.32
, climbing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
has quality bad 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(jumping, has quality wrong)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(jumping, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sport, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sport, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rolling, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(climbing, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(jumping, has quality wrong)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(jumping, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(rolling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(rolling, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(climbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(climbing, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(jumping, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(jumping, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(jumping, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(jumping, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(jumping, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(jumping, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(jumping, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(rolling, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(climbing, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(jumping, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)