jungle: have trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.60
, song
Weight: 0.59
, style
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, work
Weight: 0.52
Siblings love song
Weight: 0.32
, marsh
Weight: 0.32
, grassland
Weight: 0.32
, wetland
Weight: 0.32
, paradise
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have trees 1.00
have thick trees 0.90
be thick with trees 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(jungle, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(grassland, have trees)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(jungle, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(grassland, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(grassland, have trees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(jungle, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(jungle, have trees)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(jungle, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(jungle, be thick with trees)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(jungle, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(jungle, be thick with trees)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(jungle, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(jungle, be thick with trees)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(jungle, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(jungle, have thick trees)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(jungle, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(jungle, have thick trees)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(jungle, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(jungle, have thick trees)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(jungle, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(jungle, be thick with trees)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(jungle, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(jungle, have thick trees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(jungle, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(jungle, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(jungle, have trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(jungle, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(jungle, have trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(jungle, have trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(grassland, have trees)