junior: hate freshman

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents high school
Weight: 0.63
, senior
Weight: 0.59
, veteran
Weight: 0.56
, position
Weight: 0.56
Siblings coxswain
Weight: 0.41
, school district
Weight: 0.34
, basketball
Weight: 0.32
, shortstop
Weight: 0.32
, prom
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
hate freshman 1.00
is upperclassmen 0.79
is underclassmen 0.78
be called juniors 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(junior, hate freshman)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(junior, is upperclassmen)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(junior, is underclassmen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(junior, be called juniors)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(junior, is upperclassmen)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(junior, is underclassmen)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(junior, be called juniors)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(junior, is upperclassmen)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(junior, is underclassmen)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(junior, be called juniors)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(junior, is upperclassmen)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junior, is underclassmen)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(junior, be called juniors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(junior, hate freshman)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(junior, hate freshman)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(junior, hate freshman)