junior: have low sales

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents high school
Weight: 0.63
, senior
Weight: 0.59
, veteran
Weight: 0.56
, position
Weight: 0.56
Siblings coxswain
Weight: 0.41
, school district
Weight: 0.34
, basketball
Weight: 0.32
, shortstop
Weight: 0.32
, prom
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have low sales 1.00
have sales 0.93
have low record sales 0.93
have low digital sales 0.91
have low digital record sales 0.89
have record sales 0.88
have digital sales 0.85
have digital record sales 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(junior, have low sales)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junior, have sales)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(junior, have low record sales)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(junior, have sales)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(junior, have low digital sales)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(junior, have low record sales)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(junior, have sales)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(junior, have low digital sales)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junior, have low digital record sales)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(junior, have record sales)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(junior, have low record sales)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(junior, have low digital record sales)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(junior, have digital sales)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(junior, have digital sales)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(junior, have low digital sales)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(junior, have record sales)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(junior, have digital record sales)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junior, have digital record sales)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(junior, have low digital record sales)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(junior, have record sales)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(junior, have digital sales)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(junior, have digital sales)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junior, have digital record sales)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(junior, have digital record sales)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(junior, have low digital sales)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(junior, have low digital record sales)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(junior, have record sales)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(junior, have low record sales)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junior, have sales)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(junior, have low sales)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junior, have low sales)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(junior, have low sales)