junk food: be popular in america

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in america 1.00
be prevalent in usa 0.83
is popular 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(junk food, be popular in america)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is popular)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(junk food, be popular in america)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(fast food, is popular)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is popular)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(junk food, be popular in america)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(junk food, be prevalent in usa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(junk food, be prevalent in usa)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(junk food, be prevalent in usa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(junk food, is popular)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is popular)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(junk food, is popular)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be prevalent in usa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be popular in america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(junk food, be popular in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fast food, is popular)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(junk food, be popular in america)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is popular)