junk food: have calories

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
have calories 1.00
have many calories 0.98
be high in calories 0.97
contain calories 0.94
contain many calories 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fast food, have many calories)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fast food, have calories)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be high in calories)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(fast food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fast food, have calories)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fast food, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fast food, be high in calories)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(fast food, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food, have many calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(junk food, have calories)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have many calories)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be high in calories)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(junk food, contain calories)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(junk food, contain many calories)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(junk food, contain calories)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(junk food, contain calories)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(junk food, contain calories)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(junk food, be high in calories)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(junk food, contain many calories)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(junk food, have many calories)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(junk food, be high in calories)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(junk food, contain many calories)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(junk food, be high in calories)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(junk food, contain many calories)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(junk food, have many calories)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(junk food, have many calories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have calories)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(junk food, have calories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fast food, have calories)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(fast food, be high in calories)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(junk food, have calories)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fast food, have many calories)