junk food: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
is harmful 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is harmful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(fast food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fast food, is dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fast food, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(fast food, is harmful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(junk food, is dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(junk food, is harmful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(junk food, is harmful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(junk food, is harmful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is harmful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(fast food, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fast food, is harmful)