junk food: is unhealthy food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is unhealthy food 1.00
is food 0.86
be better than healthy food 0.81
is fast food 0.80
be cheaper than healthy food 0.80
be better than food 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is unhealthy food)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fast food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, is food)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fast food, is food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(junk food, is unhealthy food)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(junk food, is food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is fast food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(junk food, is food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(junk food, be better than food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be better than food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(junk food, is food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(junk food, is fast food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(junk food, be better than food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(junk food, is fast food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(junk food, is fast food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(junk food, be better than food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is unhealthy food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(junk food, is unhealthy food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fast food, is food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)