juror: be for highly politicized case

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.63
, witness
Weight: 0.54
, prejudice
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings jury
Weight: 0.59
, defendant
Weight: 0.36
, one person
Weight: 0.34
, elderly person
Weight: 0.34
, other person
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for highly politicized case 1.00
be for highly politicized case chosen 0.98
be for politicized case 0.96
be for politicized case chosen 0.94
be for case 0.77
be for case chosen 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(juror, be for highly politicized case)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(juror, be for highly politicized case chosen)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(juror, be for highly politicized case chosen)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(juror, be for politicized case)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(juror, be for politicized case chosen)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(juror, be for highly politicized case chosen)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(juror, be for highly politicized case chosen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(juror, be for politicized case chosen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(juror, be for politicized case chosen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(juror, be for politicized case chosen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(juror, be for politicized case)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(juror, be for case)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(juror, be for politicized case)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(juror, be for politicized case)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(juror, be for case chosen)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(juror, be for case)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(juror, be for case)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(juror, be for case)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(juror, be for case chosen)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(juror, be for case chosen)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(juror, be for case chosen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(juror, be for highly politicized case)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(juror, be for highly politicized case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(juror, be for highly politicized case)