jury: end up sequestered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents duty
Weight: 0.59
, juror
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.54
Siblings court case
Weight: 0.33
, trial
Weight: 0.32
, old man
Weight: 0.32
, young woman
Weight: 0.32
, young man
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
end up sequestered 1.00
is sequestered 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(juror, is sequestered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(jury, end up sequestered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(jury, end up sequestered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(juror, is sequestered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(jury, end up sequestered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(juror, is sequestered)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(juror, is sequestered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(jury, end up sequestered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(jury, end up sequestered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(jury, end up sequestered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(jury, end up sequestered)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(jury, end up sequestered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(jury, is sequestered)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(jury, end up sequestered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(jury, is sequestered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(jury, end up sequestered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(jury, is sequestered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(jury, end up sequestered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(jury, is sequestered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(jury, end up sequestered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(jury, end up sequestered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(jury, end up sequestered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(jury, end up sequestered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(jury, end up sequestered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(jury, end up sequestered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(juror, is sequestered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(jury, end up sequestered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(juror, is sequestered)