jury: is frequently criticized

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents duty
Weight: 0.59
, juror
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.54
Siblings court case
Weight: 0.33
, trial
Weight: 0.32
, old man
Weight: 0.32
, young woman
Weight: 0.32
, young man
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is frequently criticized 1.00
is criticized 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(jury, is frequently criticized)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(jury, is frequently criticized)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(jury, is frequently criticized)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(jury, is criticized)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(jury, is frequently criticized)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(jury, is criticized)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(jury, is frequently criticized)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(jury, is criticized)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(jury, is frequently criticized)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(jury, is criticized)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(jury, is frequently criticized)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(jury, is frequently criticized)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(jury, is frequently criticized)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(jury, is frequently criticized)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(jury, is frequently criticized)