:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(kale, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(parsley, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(kale, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(eggplant, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(kale, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, is hard)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(kale, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(kale, is hard)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(kale, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(kale, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(kale, is hard)
Typical implies Plausible
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(kale, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(kale, is hard)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(kale, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(parsley, is hard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(kale, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(eggplant, is hard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(kale, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cauliflower, is hard)