kayak: be rotomolded

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents craft
Weight: 0.69
, boat
Weight: 0.65
, vessel
Weight: 0.61
, site
Weight: 0.61
Siblings paddle
Weight: 0.51
, canoe
Weight: 0.40
, sailboat
Weight: 0.36
, dinghy
Weight: 0.35
, skiff
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rotomolded 1.00
have 0.76
is are given 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(boat, is are given)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(kayak, be rotomolded)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(kayak, be rotomolded)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(boat, is are given)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kayak, be rotomolded)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(boat, is are given)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(boat, is are given)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(kayak, be rotomolded)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(kayak, be rotomolded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(kayak, be rotomolded)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(kayak, be rotomolded)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(kayak, be rotomolded)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(kayak, have)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(kayak, be rotomolded)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(kayak, have)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(kayak, be rotomolded)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(kayak, have)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(kayak, be rotomolded)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(kayak, have)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(kayak, be rotomolded)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(kayak, be rotomolded)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kayak, be rotomolded)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(kayak, be rotomolded)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(kayak, be rotomolded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kayak, be rotomolded)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(boat, is are given)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(kayak, be rotomolded)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(boat, is are given)