ken: be mad at mike

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.62
, folk
Weight: 0.57
, friend
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings john smith
Weight: 0.34
, adam smith
Weight: 0.34
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be mad at mike 1.00
be mad at magic mike 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ken, be mad at mike)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ken, be mad at mike)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ken, be mad at mike)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ken, be mad at magic mike)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ken, be mad at mike)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(ken, be mad at magic mike)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(ken, be mad at mike)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(ken, be mad at magic mike)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(ken, be mad at mike)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ken, be mad at magic mike)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(ken, be mad at mike)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ken, be mad at mike)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(ken, be mad at mike)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ken, be mad at mike)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ken, be mad at mike)