ken: is famous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.62
, folk
Weight: 0.57
, friend
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings john smith
Weight: 0.34
, adam smith
Weight: 0.34
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is kutaragi famous 1.00
is famous 1.00
is popular 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(adam smith, is famous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(john smith, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(michael jackson, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(michael jackson, is famous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(john smith, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(john smith, is famous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(adam smith, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(adam smith, is famous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(michael jackson, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(michael jackson, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ken, is famous)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(ken, is kutaragi famous)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ken, is kutaragi famous)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(ken, is kutaragi famous)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ken, is kutaragi famous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ken, is popular)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ken, is popular)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ken, is popular)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ken, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ken, is famous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ken, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(michael jackson, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(john smith, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(adam smith, is famous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ken, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(michael jackson, is popular)