kevin: was on crutches

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents star
Weight: 0.58
, guy
Weight: 0.55
, legend
Weight: 0.53
, person
Weight: 0.51
, boy
Weight: 0.51
Siblings michael jackson
Weight: 0.35
, boy george
Weight: 0.35
, paul mccartney
Weight: 0.34
, jesse james
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was on crutches 1.00
have crutches 0.99
was on crutches in freak 0.95
have crutches on shameless 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(kevin, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was on crutches)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(kevin, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(michael jackson, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(michael jackson, was on crutches)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(kevin, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(kevin, was on crutches)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(kevin, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(kevin, was on crutches in freak)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(kevin, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(kevin, have crutches on shameless)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(kevin, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(kevin, was on crutches in freak)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(kevin, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(kevin, have crutches on shameless)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(kevin, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(kevin, was on crutches in freak)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(kevin, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(kevin, have crutches on shameless)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(kevin, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(kevin, was on crutches in freak)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(kevin, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(kevin, have crutches on shameless)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(kevin, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(kevin, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(kevin, was on crutches)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(kevin, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(kevin, was on crutches)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(kevin, was on crutches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(michael jackson, was on crutches)