kid: fall in love

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents young people
Weight: 0.71
, jerk
Weight: 0.71
, creature
Weight: 0.67
, athlete
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nephew
Weight: 0.67
, boy scout
Weight: 0.66
, sesame street
Weight: 0.65
, tom
Weight: 0.60
, couple
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
fall in love 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(kid, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(couple, fall in love)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(kid, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(couple, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(couple, fall in love)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(kid, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(kid, fall in love)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(kid, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(kid, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(kid, fall in love)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(kid, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(kid, fall in love)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(kid, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(couple, fall in love)