kid: love play

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents young people
Weight: 0.71
, jerk
Weight: 0.71
, creature
Weight: 0.67
, athlete
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nephew
Weight: 0.67
, boy scout
Weight: 0.66
, sesame street
Weight: 0.65
, tom
Weight: 0.60
, couple
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
love play 1.00
play more 0.83
play nowadays games 0.83
play games 0.82
play sport 0.81
play nowadays older games 0.81
play dang video games 0.80
play video games 0.78
be allowed play 0.78
play dota 2 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(athlete, play sport)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(kid, love play)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(kid, love play)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(athlete, play sport)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(kid, love play)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(athlete, play sport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(athlete, play sport)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(kid, love play)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(kid, love play)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(kid, love play)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(kid, love play)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(kid, love play)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(kid, be allowed play)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(kid, love play)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(kid, be allowed play)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(kid, love play)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(kid, be allowed play)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(kid, love play)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(kid, be allowed play)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(kid, love play)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(kid, love play)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(kid, love play)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(kid, love play)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(kid, love play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(kid, love play)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(athlete, play sport)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(kid, love play)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(athlete, play sport)