kidney: failure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents urinary tract
Weight: 0.66
, complication
Weight: 0.66
, body part
Weight: 0.66
, organ
Weight: 0.64
Siblings kidney stone
Weight: 0.72
, hemolytic anemia
Weight: 0.64
, diabetes
Weight: 0.64
, liver
Weight: 0.62
, pyelonephritis
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
failure 1.00
has state failure 0.95
cause of is failure 0.93
fail with liver failure 0.88
be fatal failure 0.87
leading cause of is failure 0.84
complication of is failure 0.84
fail 0.81
fails 0.77
fail at time 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(liver, failure)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(liver, be fatal failure)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(liver, fail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(liver, complication of is failure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(liver, failure)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(liver, failure)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(liver, fail)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(liver, fail)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(liver, be fatal failure)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(liver, be fatal failure)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(liver, complication of is failure)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(liver, complication of is failure)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(kidney, failure)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(kidney, fail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(kidney, fails)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(kidney, fail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(kidney, fails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidney, fail)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(kidney, has state failure)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(kidney, fails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(kidney, has state failure)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(kidney, has state failure)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(kidney, fails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(kidney, fail)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kidney, has state failure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(kidney, failure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(kidney, failure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(liver, failure)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(liver, fail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(liver, be fatal failure)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(kidney, failure)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(liver, complication of is failure)