killer: ate victims

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents criminal
Weight: 0.58
, artist
Weight: 0.57
, murderer
Weight: 0.56
, name
Weight: 0.56
Siblings malaria
Weight: 0.64
, stroke
Weight: 0.61
, child molester
Weight: 0.33
, rapist
Weight: 0.32
, drug addict
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
ate victims 1.00
bite victims 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(murderer, bite victims) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(killer, ate victims)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(killer, ate victims) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(murderer, bite victims)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(killer, ate victims) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(murderer, bite victims)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(murderer, bite victims) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(killer, ate victims) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(killer, ate victims)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(killer, ate victims) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(killer, ate victims)

Similarity expansion

0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(killer, ate victims) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(killer, bite victims)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(killer, ate victims) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(killer, bite victims)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(killer, ate victims) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(killer, bite victims)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(killer, ate victims) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(killer, bite victims)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(killer, ate victims) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(killer, ate victims) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(killer, ate victims)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(killer, ate victims) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(killer, ate victims)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(killer, ate victims) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(murderer, bite victims)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(killer, ate victims) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(murderer, bite victims)