kilt: is worn

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.56
, accessory
Weight: 0.54
, garment
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, clothing
Weight: 0.47
Siblings dress
Weight: 0.33
, underwear
Weight: 0.32
, scarf
Weight: 0.32
, sweatshirt
Weight: 0.32
, t shirt
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is worn 1.00
be worn without underwear 0.88
be worn in scotland 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(dress, is worn)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(underwear, is worn)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(underwear, is worn)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(underwear, is worn)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(dress, is worn)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(dress, is worn)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(kilt, is worn)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(kilt, be worn without underwear)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(kilt, be worn without underwear)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(kilt, be worn without underwear)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(kilt, be worn in scotland)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(kilt, be worn without underwear)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(kilt, be worn in scotland)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(kilt, be worn in scotland)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(kilt, be worn in scotland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(kilt, is worn)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(kilt, is worn)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(underwear, is worn)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(kilt, is worn)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(dress, is worn)