kim: be famous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.62
, woman
Weight: 0.60
, artist
Weight: 0.59
, actor
Weight: 0.54
, star
Weight: 0.53
Siblings michael jackson
Weight: 0.35
, michael jordan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be famous 1.00
is famous 0.99
be kardashian famous 0.88
is kardashian famous 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(actor, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(kim, be famous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(celebrity, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(kim, be famous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(celebrity, is famous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(actor, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(actor, is famous)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(michael jordan, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, is famous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(actor, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(kim, be famous)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(celebrity, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(kim, be famous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(michael jackson, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(michael jackson, is famous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(michael jordan, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(michael jordan, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(kim, be famous)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(kim, is famous)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(kim, is famous)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(kim, is famous)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(kim, be kardashian famous)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(kim, is kardashian famous)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(kim, be famous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(kim, be famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(celebrity, is famous)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(actor, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(michael jackson, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(michael jordan, is famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(celebrity, is famous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(kim, be famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(actor, is famous)