kinetic energy: be increased

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, force
Weight: 0.61
, energy
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, parameter
Weight: 0.56
Siblings thermal energy
Weight: 0.69
, solar energy
Weight: 0.38
, solar wind
Weight: 0.33
, power
Weight: 0.33
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be increased 1.00
increases with increase in temperature 0.80
increases with with increase in temperature 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(power, be increased)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(kinetic energy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(power, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(power, be increased)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(kinetic energy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(kinetic energy, be increased)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(kinetic energy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, increases with with increase in temperature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, increases with with increase in temperature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(kinetic energy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(kinetic energy, increases with with increase in temperature)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(kinetic energy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(kinetic energy, increases with increase in temperature)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, increases with increase in temperature)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(kinetic energy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, increases with increase in temperature)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(kinetic energy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, increases with with increase in temperature)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(kinetic energy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, increases with increase in temperature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(kinetic energy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be increased)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(kinetic energy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be increased)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be increased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(power, be increased)