kinetic energy: be renewable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, force
Weight: 0.61
, energy
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, parameter
Weight: 0.56
Siblings thermal energy
Weight: 0.69
, solar energy
Weight: 0.38
, solar wind
Weight: 0.33
, power
Weight: 0.33
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be renewable 1.00
is renewable 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be renewable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(energy, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be renewable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(energy, is renewable)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(energy, be renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be renewable)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, is renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(power, is renewable)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be renewable)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, is renewable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be renewable)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(energy, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be renewable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(solar energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be renewable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(solar energy, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(solar energy, is renewable)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(power, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(power, is renewable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(kinetic energy, be renewable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be renewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(energy, is renewable)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(energy, be renewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(solar energy, is renewable)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(solar energy, be renewable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(power, is renewable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(energy, is renewable)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(kinetic energy, be renewable)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(energy, be renewable)