:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, eat fish)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(robin, eat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, eat fish)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(owl, eat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, eat fish)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(heron, eat)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(kingfisher, eat fish)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(robin, eat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(robin, eat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(kingfisher, eat fish)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(heron, eat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(heron, eat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(kingfisher, eat fish)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(owl, eat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(owl, eat)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, eat fish)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(heron, eat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, eat fish)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(robin, eat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, eat fish)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(owl, eat)