:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(kiss, is rated)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(kissing, is rated)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(kiss, is rated)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(kiss, is rated)
Similarity expansion
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(kiss, is rated)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(kiss, is rated ma)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(kiss, is rated)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(kiss, is rated ma)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(kiss, is rated)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(kiss, is rated ma)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(kiss, is rated)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(kiss, is rated ma)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(kiss, is rated)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(kiss, is rated)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(kiss, is rated)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(kissing, is rated)