kitchen: be in restaurants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dining room
Weight: 0.76
, living room
Weight: 0.70
, cook
Weight: 0.67
, room
Weight: 0.64
, bathroom
Weight: 0.63
Siblings furniture
Weight: 0.60
, common room
Weight: 0.55
, laundry room
Weight: 0.39
, master bedroom
Weight: 0.37
, dining table
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in restaurants 1.00
be pre-blocked in hotels 0.82
is food 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(room, be pre-blocked in hotels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(kitchen, be in restaurants)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cook, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(kitchen, be in restaurants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(kitchen, be in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cook, is food)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(kitchen, be in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(room, be pre-blocked in hotels)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(room, be pre-blocked in hotels)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cook, is food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(room, be pre-blocked in hotels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(kitchen, be in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be in restaurants)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cook, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(kitchen, be in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be in restaurants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(kitchen, be in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(kitchen, be in restaurants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(kitchen, be in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(kitchen, be in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be in restaurants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(kitchen, be in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(kitchen, be in restaurants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cook, is food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(room, be pre-blocked in hotels)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(kitchen, be in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cook, is food)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(kitchen, be in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(room, be pre-blocked in hotels)