knife: be used to pare apple

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.74
, swiss army knife
Weight: 0.69
, weapon
Weight: 0.64
, object
Weight: 0.64
Siblings butter knife
Weight: 0.77
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.73
, cleaver
Weight: 0.65
, pocket
Weight: 0.59
, dagger
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to pare apple 1.00
be used to pare 0.93
cut apple 0.86
cut that apple 0.85
be used to peel apple 0.79
be used to trim 0.78
cut tomatoe 0.77
cut potato 0.77
cut 0.77
be used to cut 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(dagger, be used to cut)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cleaver, be used to cut)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cleaver, be used to cut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cleaver, be used to cut)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(dagger, be used to cut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(dagger, be used to cut)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(knife, be used to pare apple)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(knife, cut that apple)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(knife, cut apple)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(knife, cut)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(knife, be used to peel apple)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(knife, cut apple)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(knife, be used to peel apple)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(knife, be used to peel apple)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(knife, be used to peel apple)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(knife, cut that apple)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(knife, cut apple)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(knife, cut apple)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(knife, cut that apple)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(knife, cut that apple)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(knife, cut)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(knife, cut)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(knife, cut)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(knife, be used to pare apple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(knife, be used to pare apple)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cleaver, be used to cut)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(knife, be used to pare apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(dagger, be used to cut)