knife: cut food

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.74
, swiss army knife
Weight: 0.69
, weapon
Weight: 0.64
, object
Weight: 0.64
Siblings butter knife
Weight: 0.77
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.73
, cleaver
Weight: 0.65
, pocket
Weight: 0.59
, dagger
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
cut food 1.00
be cut food 1.00
be used to cut food 0.99
cut 0.89
be used to cut 0.89
be used to cut meat 0.88
be used to cut meat with 0.88
be used to cut with 0.87
cut you 0.87
cut person 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kitchen utensil, be used to cut food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(knife, cut food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(kitchen utensil, be used to cut meat)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(knife, cut food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(kitchen utensil, be used to cut food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(kitchen utensil, be used to cut meat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(kitchen utensil, be used to cut meat)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(kitchen utensil, be used to cut food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(dagger, be used to cut)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cleaver, be used to cut)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kitchen utensil, be used to cut food)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(knife, cut food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(kitchen utensil, be used to cut meat)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(knife, cut food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cleaver, be used to cut)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cleaver, be used to cut)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(dagger, be used to cut)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(dagger, be used to cut)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(knife, cut food)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(knife, cut)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(knife, cut)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(knife, cut you)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(knife, be used to cut meat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(knife, be used to cut meat with)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(knife, cut food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(knife, cut food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(kitchen utensil, be used to cut food)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(kitchen utensil, be used to cut meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cleaver, be used to cut)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(dagger, be used to cut)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(kitchen utensil, be used to cut food)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(knife, cut food)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(kitchen utensil, be used to cut meat)