knight: were important in middle ages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents warrior
Weight: 0.75
, man
Weight: 0.64
, hero
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.60
, film
Weight: 0.59
Siblings prince
Weight: 0.35
, superman
Weight: 0.34
, samurai
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were important in middle ages 1.00
were paid in middle ages 0.94
were treated in middle ages 0.94
were chosen in middle ages 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(knight, were important in middle ages)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(knight, were treated in middle ages)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(knight, were treated in middle ages)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(knight, were treated in middle ages)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(knight, were chosen in middle ages)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(knight, were paid in middle ages)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(knight, were chosen in middle ages)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(knight, were paid in middle ages)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(knight, were treated in middle ages)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(knight, were chosen in middle ages)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(knight, were paid in middle ages)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(knight, were chosen in middle ages)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(knight, were paid in middle ages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(knight, were important in middle ages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(knight, were important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(knight, were important in middle ages)