koi: uso suprisingly good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.74
, restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, pond
Weight: 0.38
, carp
Weight: 0.29
, goldfish
Weight: 0.27
Siblings koi carp
Weight: 0.41
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.38
, steelhead trout
Weight: 0.37
, sturgeon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
uso suprisingly good 1.00
uso good 0.89
is uso 0.86
is las vegas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(koi, uso suprisingly good)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(koi, is uso)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(koi, uso good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(koi, is uso)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(koi, is uso)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(koi, is las vegas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(koi, is las vegas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(koi, uso good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(koi, uso good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(koi, is las vegas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(koi, is las vegas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(koi, is uso)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(koi, uso good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(koi, uso suprisingly good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(koi, uso suprisingly good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(koi, uso suprisingly good)