la: be better than new york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.53
, city
Weight: 0.53
, movie
Weight: 0.52
, song
Weight: 0.52
Siblings rio de janeiro
Weight: 0.32
, des moines
Weight: 0.32
, tierra del fuego
Weight: 0.32
, ala
Weight: 0.32
, di
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than new york 1.00
be better than york 0.98
be better than nyc 0.86
be better than ny 0.80
be hotter than diego 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(la, be better than new york)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(la, be better than york)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(la, be better than york)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(la, be better than york)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(la, be better than york)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(la, be better than nyc)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(la, be better than ny)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(la, be better than nyc)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(la, be better than nyc)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(la, be better than ny)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(la, be better than ny)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(la, be better than nyc)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(la, be better than ny)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(la, be better than new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(la, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(la, be better than new york)