lab rat: has physical part eyes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.61
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, title
Weight: 0.53
, experiment
Weight: 0.43
Siblings rat
Weight: 0.37
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.35
, rodent
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part eyes 1.00
have red eyes 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(lab rat, has physical part eyes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, have red eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(lab rat, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rodent, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rodent, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(rodent, have red eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(lab rat, has physical part eyes)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lab rat, have red eyes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(lab rat, have red eyes)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(lab rat, have red eyes)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(lab rat, have red eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lab rat, has physical part eyes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(lab rat, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rodent, have red eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(lab rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)