labour: is scarce

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.54
, group
Weight: 0.54
, input
Weight: 0.53
, sector
Weight: 0.53
, policy
Weight: 0.52
Siblings functional group
Weight: 0.28
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.28
, terrorist organization
Weight: 0.28
, natural gas
Weight: 0.28
, financial institution
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
is scarce 1.00
be most abundant factor of production 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(resource, is scarce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(labour, is scarce)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(labour, is scarce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(resource, is scarce)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(labour, is scarce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(resource, is scarce)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(resource, is scarce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(labour, is scarce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(labour, is scarce)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(labour, is scarce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(labour, is scarce)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(labour, is scarce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(labour, be most abundant factor of production)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(labour, is scarce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(labour, be most abundant factor of production)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(labour, is scarce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(labour, be most abundant factor of production)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(labour, is scarce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(labour, be most abundant factor of production)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(labour, is scarce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(labour, is scarce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(labour, is scarce)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(labour, is scarce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(labour, is scarce)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(labour, is scarce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(resource, is scarce)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(labour, is scarce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(resource, is scarce)