:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Property |
Similarity |
drool |
1.00 |
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(labrador, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(beagle, drool)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(labrador, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, drool)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(labrador, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, drool)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(labrador, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(beagle, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(beagle, drool)
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(labrador, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(labrador, drool)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(labrador, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(labrador, drool)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(labrador, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(beagle, drool)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(labrador, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rottweiler, drool)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(labrador, drool)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dachshund, drool)