labrador: is best guide dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.69
, breed
Weight: 0.69
, canine
Weight: 0.57
, country
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.55
Siblings labrador retriever
Weight: 0.41
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.39
, beagle
Weight: 0.39
, dachshund
Weight: 0.39
, rottweiler
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best guide dogs 1.00
is good guide dogs 0.98
is guide dogs 0.97
make good guide dogs 0.96
make guide dogs 0.96
be used for guide dogs 0.95
be used as guide dogs 0.95
be most popular guide dogs 0.94
is best dogs 0.90
is good dogs 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, be used as guide dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, is best dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, is good dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(labrador retriever, be used as guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, be used as guide dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rottweiler, is best dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, is best dogs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rottweiler, is good dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, is good dogs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(beagle, is good dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(labrador, is best guide dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(labrador, is good guide dogs)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(labrador, is guide dogs)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(labrador, is good guide dogs)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(labrador, is guide dogs)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(labrador, make good guide dogs)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(labrador, is best guide dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(labrador, is best guide dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, be used as guide dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rottweiler, is good dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rottweiler, is best dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(labrador, is best guide dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, is good dogs)