lack: affect atp

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, reason
Weight: 0.61
, ability
Weight: 0.61
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings absence
Weight: 0.64
, poor people
Weight: 0.60
, apathy
Weight: 0.34
, laziness
Weight: 0.34
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect atp 1.00
affect change 0.82
affect life 0.82
affect health 0.80
affect system 0.80
affect business 0.79
affect body 0.79
affect women 0.79
affect function 0.79
affect risk 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lack, affect atp)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(factor, affect health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lack, affect atp)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(factor, affect health)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(factor, affect business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect health)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(laziness, affect life)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(lack, affect atp)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(factor, affect health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(lack, affect atp)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(laziness, affect life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(laziness, affect life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(lack, affect atp)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect women)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect body)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect health)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect risk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect system)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(lack, affect system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(lack, affect risk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(lack, affect system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(lack, affect system)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(lack, affect body)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(lack, affect health)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(lack, affect risk)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lack, affect body)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lack, affect health)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lack, affect risk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lack, affect health)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lack, affect body)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(lack, affect women)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(lack, affect women)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lack, affect women)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect atp)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lack, affect atp)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, affect health)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(laziness, affect life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, affect health)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(lack, affect atp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)