lack: affect children

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, reason
Weight: 0.61
, ability
Weight: 0.61
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings absence
Weight: 0.64
, poor people
Weight: 0.60
, apathy
Weight: 0.34
, laziness
Weight: 0.34
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect children 1.00
have children 0.91
have more children 0.88
have many children 0.87
having children 0.84
affect women 0.83
have kids 0.82
have many kids 0.81
affect life 0.81
have more children than rich people 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(factor, affect children)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lack, affect children)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(factor, affect children)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect children)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(poor people, have children)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(poor people, have more children)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(poor people, have many children)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(poor people, having children)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(poor people, have more children than rich people)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(poor people, have many kids)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(poor people, have kids)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(laziness, affect life)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(factor, affect children)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lack, affect children)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(poor people, have children)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(poor people, have children)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(poor people, have more children)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(poor people, have more children)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(poor people, have many children)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(poor people, have many children)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(poor people, having children)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(poor people, having children)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(laziness, affect life)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(laziness, affect life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(poor people, have more children than rich people)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(poor people, have more children than rich people)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(poor people, have many kids)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(poor people, have many kids)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(poor people, have kids)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(poor people, have kids)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(lack, affect children)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lack, affect women)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(lack, affect women)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(lack, affect women)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect women)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lack, affect children)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(factor, affect children)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(laziness, affect life)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(poor people, have children)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(poor people, having children)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(poor people, have more children)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(poor people, have more children than rich people)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(poor people, have many children)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(poor people, have many kids)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(poor people, have kids)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(lack, affect children)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(factor, affect children)