lack: affect glycolysis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, reason
Weight: 0.61
, ability
Weight: 0.61
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings absence
Weight: 0.64
, poor people
Weight: 0.60
, apathy
Weight: 0.34
, laziness
Weight: 0.34
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect glycolysis 1.00
affect protein synthesis 0.84
affect cells 0.79
affect drug metabolism 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(lack, affect glycolysis)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(lack, affect cells)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lack, affect protein synthesis)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(lack, affect cells)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lack, affect drug metabolism)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(lack, affect cells)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(lack, affect protein synthesis)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect protein synthesis)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(lack, affect protein synthesis)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(lack, affect drug metabolism)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(lack, affect drug metabolism)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect drug metabolism)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect cells)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect glycolysis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lack, affect glycolysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lack, affect glycolysis)