lack: affect sports performer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, reason
Weight: 0.61
, ability
Weight: 0.61
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings absence
Weight: 0.64
, poor people
Weight: 0.60
, apathy
Weight: 0.34
, laziness
Weight: 0.34
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect sports performer 1.00
affect sports performance 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ability, affect sports performance)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lack, affect sports performer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lack, affect sports performer)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(ability, affect sports performance)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect sports performer)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ability, affect sports performance)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ability, affect sports performance)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lack, affect sports performer)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(lack, affect sports performer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lack, affect sports performer)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(lack, affect sports performer)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(lack, affect sports performer)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lack, affect sports performance)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(lack, affect sports performer)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(lack, affect sports performance)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lack, affect sports performer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(lack, affect sports performance)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lack, affect sports performer)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect sports performance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(lack, affect sports performer)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lack, affect sports performer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect sports performer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lack, affect sports performer)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lack, affect sports performer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect sports performer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ability, affect sports performance)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(lack, affect sports performer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ability, affect sports performance)